News & Insights

Home » News & Insights » The War on Puffing

The War on Puffing

Other

The battle between smokers and non-smokers has been raging for the better part of two decades, and it seems that the non-smokers have all but won. Boards are introducing new clauses in proprietary leases, or bylaw amendments, prohibiting smoking completely – and not just in common areas. While the prevailing belief is that we can do whatever we wish inside of our own homes (so long as it’s legal), reality does not match up.  As has been addressed in previous posts on this blog, coop boards have a wide breadth of power when it comes to restricting shareholder’s activities, even within each individual unit.  It is each building’s board, not the unit owner/shareholder that truly is the “king of the castle.”  It’s becoming more and more common for boards to restrict smoking in every part of their buildings. Those initiatives are attracting considerably more support and considerably less opposition than they have in the past, especially as second hand smoke has been labeled a carcinogen.  After all, a building can and should limit residents’ exposure to toxic substances.

The most effective method of effecting a ban on smoking in buildings is to amend the proprietary lease to include an explicit ban.  Depending on your building’s bylaws, a supermajority vote may be required, but with the war on smoking all but over and won, a supermajority on this issue is not relatively difficult to achieve, with the national rate of smokers having fallen below 20 percent, and the dangers of second hand smoke being widely known and accepted.  A proprietary lease amendment may be preferred by your board because as a contractual provision, it provides a more secure ban with less vulnerability to court challenges than a simple “nuisance” clause.  While the courts remain reluctant to restrict what individuals can do within their own homes, they are less likely to challenge a policy approved by a supermajority of owners than one imposed by the community’s elected board.

Recent Posts

Impact of Shorter COVID-19 Quarantine on Workplaces

On Monday, the CDC announced changes to its recommended isolation and quarantine time from 10 days to 5 days for asymptomatic people with COVID-19. They recommend that people leaving isolation after 5 days continue to wear a mask for the following 5 days. The CDC also...

Restaurants Sue Over Vaccine Mandate

Restaurant operators sued Mayor Bill de Blasio and New York City over Key to NYC, the new indoor vaccine mandate program, on August 17-the same day the mandate went into effect. A group of restaurants in Staten Island, through the Independent Restaurant Owners...

Financial Regulators’ New Target: Social Media Influencers and SPACs

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) will conduct three new regulatory sweeps in an effort to combat various activities causing extreme fluctuations in the financial markets. FINRA has chosen to target special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”),...

Does WARN Apply to Virus Closures?

Enterprise, in Benson et al. v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Florida LLC et al., has tried to argue that the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”), through its natural disaster exception, does not apply to closures caused by COVID-19. Two Florida...