News & Insights

Home » News & Insights » The curious rise of pop music copyright litigation

The curious rise of pop music copyright litigation

Intellectual Property, Liability, Litigation, Other

Ever since the estate of Marvin Gaye was awarded $5.3 million by a jury in 2015 after it determined that Robin Thicke, Pharell, and T.I.’s smash 2013 hit song “Blurred Lines” was too similar to Gaye’s 1977 “Got To Give It Up”, the world of pop music has been reshaped by an increase in litigation alleging song theft, plagiarism, and copyright infringement. According to reporting from the New York Times, the aftermath of the “Blurred Lines” decision has hit star musicians and artists just starting out alike. Big stars worry that a lawsuit could force them to hand over a large chunk of their earnings, as in the case with Robin Thicke. For more obscure artists with fewer resources, legal fees can easily cripple a budding career, not to mention the reputational hit for a little-known artist who enters the public eye with the tag of plagiarist—hardly an auspicious start to creating a public persona. [1]

Many musicians have found themselves tangled in litigation since the jury award in 2015. Ed Sheeran has both settled and gone to court over two of his songs, and many artists and producers have also started taking pre-emptive action by crediting more individuals for contributing to songwriting. This includes writing credits for cadences that may be perceived as overly similar, as in Taylor Swift crediting Right Said Fred for her 2017 song “Look What You Made Me Do”, which bore a resemblance to the 1991 song “I’m Too Sexy”. Given the iterative nature of pop music, as well as the limited combinations of sounds and notes that people typically perceive as pleasant, it is easy to see how this issue of crediting sources for contributing to one’s song can rapidly spiral out of control. [2]

However, as the Times notes, legal disputes over music are nothing new—they have a remarkably long history. In the United States, the earliest known lawsuit dates from 1844 and involved a fight over the publication of sheet music for W.J. Wetmore’s “The Cot Beneath the Hill”. In more recent decades, Broadway titan Andrew Lloyd Webber was famously accused of plagiarizing a key phrase from Puccini’s La fanciulla del West that formed a core part of The Phantom of the Opera’s “Music of the Night”.

In light of the proliferation of copyright suits against artists since 2015, which include the aforementioned Sheeran, Katy Perry (A $2.8 million award against her in August 2019), Drake, Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, and Ariana Grande, all artists should be ever more vigilant when creating music to shield themselves from liability. When in doubt, it might be best to throw in an additional writing credit.

[1] Sisario, B. (March 2019) ‘Blurred Lines’ on Their Minds, Songwriters Create Nervously from NY Times Accessed January 16 2020

[2] Caramanica, J. (January 2020) It’s Got a Great Beat, and You Can File a Lawsuit to It from NY Times Accessed January 16 2020

Recent Posts

Impact of Shorter COVID-19 Quarantine on Workplaces

On Monday, the CDC announced changes to its recommended isolation and quarantine time from 10 days to 5 days for asymptomatic people with COVID-19. They recommend that people leaving isolation after 5 days continue to wear a mask for the following 5 days. The CDC also...

Restaurants Sue Over Vaccine Mandate

Restaurant operators sued Mayor Bill de Blasio and New York City over Key to NYC, the new indoor vaccine mandate program, on August 17-the same day the mandate went into effect. A group of restaurants in Staten Island, through the Independent Restaurant Owners...

Financial Regulators’ New Target: Social Media Influencers and SPACs

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) will conduct three new regulatory sweeps in an effort to combat various activities causing extreme fluctuations in the financial markets. FINRA has chosen to target special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”),...

Does WARN Apply to Virus Closures?

Enterprise, in Benson et al. v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Florida LLC et al., has tried to argue that the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”), through its natural disaster exception, does not apply to closures caused by COVID-19. Two Florida...